IVUSAID Recommended Reading

Home
IVUSAID Home
IVUSAID Recommended Reading

Expert Consensus Documents, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Books

1. Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Ali Z, Maehara A. Clinical Utility of Intravascular Imaging: Past, Present, and Future. JACC Cardiovascular imaging 2022;15:1799-1820.
2. Saito Y, Kobayashi Y, Fujii K et al. Clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (2021). Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2022;37:40-51.
3. Johnson TW, Raber L, di Mario C et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. European heart journal 2019;40:2566-2584.
4. Raber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. European heart journal 2018;39:3281-3300.
5. Gamal AS, Ahmed JM, Mintz GS. Coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in “Practical Interventional Cardiology”. CRC Press 2017.
6. Mintz G. Intracoronary Ultrasound. Taylor & Francis 2005.
7. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2001;37:1478-92.

IVUS-guided PCI and Long-term Outcomes

1. Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB et al. Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 5. Online ahead of print.
2. Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ et al. 3-Year Outcomes of the ULTIMATE Trial Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2021;14:247-257.
3. Choi IJ, Lim S, Choo EH et al. Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2021;14:2431-2443.
4. Mentias A, Sarrazin MV, Saad M et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stenting With and Without Use of Intravascular Ultrasound. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2020;13:1880-1890.
5. Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM et al. Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: 5-Year Follow-Up of the IVUS-XPL Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2020;13:62-71.
6. Malik AH, Yandrapalli S, Aronow WS, Panza JA, Cooper HA. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation reduces cardiovascular mortality – Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International journal of cardiology 2020;299:100-105.
7. Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J et al. Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018;72:3126-3137.
8. Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH et al. Meta-analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies. The American journal of cardiology 2014;113:1338-47.
9. Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. American heart journal 2013;165:65-72.
10. Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2013;6:369-76.
11. Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Song H et al. Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions 2011;4:562-9.

IVUS Imaging of Coronary Calcification

1. Zhang M, Matsumura M, Usui E et al. Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Calcium Score to Predict Stent Expansion in Severely Calcified Lesions. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions 2021;14:e010296.
2. Kim SS, Yamamoto MH, Maehara A et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the effects of rotational atherectomy in calcified coronary artery lesions. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2018;34:1365-1371.
3. Wang X, Matsumura M, Mintz GS et al. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography. Jacc-Cardiovasc Imag 2017;10:869-879.
4. Jia H, Abtahian F, Aguirre AD et al. In vivo diagnosis of plaque erosion and calcified nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013;62:1748-58.
5. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Wolski K et al. Coronary artery calcification and changes in atheroma burden in response to established medical therapies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2007;49:263-70.
6. Ehara S, Kobayashi Y, Yoshiyama M et al. Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2004;110:3424-9.
7. Lee JB, Mintz GS, Lisauskas JB et al. Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules. The American journal of cardiology 2011;108:1547-51.

IVUS for Guiding In-stent Restenosis Treatment

1. Erdogan E, Bajaj R, Lansky A, Mathur A, Baumbach A, Bourantas CV. Intravascular Imaging for Guiding In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis Therapy. Journal of the American Heart Association 2022:e026492.
2. Lee T, Shlofmitz RA, Song L et al. The effectiveness of excimer laser angioplasty to treat coronary in-stent restenosis with peri-stent calcium as assessed by optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2019;15:e279-e288.
3. Shlofmitz E, Iantorno M, Waksman R. Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: A New Classification System Based on Disease Mechanism to Guide Treatment and State-of-the-Art Review. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions 2019;12:e007023.
4. Kobayashi N, Mintz GS, Witzenbichler B et al. Prevalence, Features, and Prognostic Importance of Edge Dissection After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: An ADAPT-DES Intravascular Ultrasound Substudy. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions 2016;9:e003553.
5. Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Song H et al. Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions 2011;4:562-9.
6. Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Dutary J et al. Implantation of a drug-eluting stent with a different drug (switch strategy) in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Results from a prospective multicenter study (RIBS III [Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent]). JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2012;5:728-37.